Disclaimer: This article is not intended to be a recommendation. The author is not responsible for any resulting actions of the company during your trading experience. The information provided in this article may not be accurate or up-to-date. Any trading or financial decision you make is your sole responsibility, and you must not rely on any information provided here. We do not provide any warranties regarding the information on this website and are not responsible for any losses or damages incurred as a result of trading or investing.
For anyone who’s ever tried to quit smoking, the journey is a familiar one: the determined New Year’s resolution, the box of nicotine patches bought in hope, the frustrating feeling when you’re back to square one a few weeks later. For the UK’s nearly 5 million smokers, it’s a cycle many know all too well. But what if the most common quitting aids, the ones that have been pushed for decades, aren’t actually the most effective?
A groundbreaking scientific review is shaking up the public health world, confirming what many in the vaping community have been saying for years: e-cigarettes are a significantly more successful tool for quitting smoking than traditional nicotine replacement therapies (NRT).
The study in question isn’t just any old paper; it’s a major update to the prestigious Cochrane Review, widely considered the gold standard for independent, trustworthy medical evidence. After meticulously analyzing 78 different studies involving over 22,000 participants, their international team of researchers found “high-certainty evidence” that people using nicotine e-cigarettes were more likely to successfully stop smoking for at least six months.
The results are striking. For every 100 people trying to quit, the review found that between 8 and 10 were successful with nicotine vapes. That might not sound like a huge number on its own, but it’s a significant leap from the just 6 out of 100 who managed to quit using patches or gum. It even outperformed non-nicotine vapes, which saw a success rate of 7 out of 100, suggesting that both the nicotine delivery and the physical act of vaping play a role.
“We see it every day in our community,” says James Smith, Head of Vaping Community at Discount Vape Pen. “Someone comes to us, completely fed up with smoking, having tried patches, gum, even hypnosis. They’re looking for something that actually addresses the habit, not just the chemical craving. This Cochrane review is so important because it validates their personal experiences with rock-solid science. It shows that making the switch to a vape isn’t just trading one habit for another; it’s choosing a demonstrably more effective off-ramp from the known dangers of combustible tobacco.”
Part of the success may lie in how vaping mimics the behavioural aspects of smoking, the hand-to-mouth action, the inhale-exhale ritual, which NRT products like patches completely ignore. This psychological component is often a major stumbling block for those trying to quit.
The review also tackled the all-important question of safety. It found that the unwanted side effects from vaping, like a cough or a dry throat, were similar to those experienced with NRT and usually faded over time. This supports the long-standing position of the NHS, which states that while not risk-free, vaping is “substantially less harmful than smoking”.
The entire conversation has to be about harm reduction, adds Smith. “No one is claiming vaping is a perfect solution, but the science is clear that it’s a world away from the proven harms of traditional cigarettes. For an adult smoker, making an informed switch to a regulated, refillable vape kit is a hugely positive step towards a smoke-free life. It’s about choosing the right tool for the job, and the evidence now firmly points towards vaping as the most effective tool we have.”
As the UK pushes towards its ambitious goal of being smoke-free by 2030, this powerful evidence offers a clearer, more hopeful path for smokers looking to finally make a change. It empowers them with the knowledge that a more effective, scientifically-backed option is out there, waiting to help them succeed where other methods have failed.
